Technology

Robotic-assisted & conventional surgery — matched to what you need

Not every knee needs a robot, and not every hip needs a full replacement. Dr. Singh explains, in plain terms, which approach fits your joint before recommending one.

Robotic-Assisted Joint Replacement

Precision planning, built around your own anatomy

3D imaging is used to build a plan of your joint before surgery. The robotic arm then helps position and align the implant within that plan, correcting for the natural variation in every patient's bone shape and soft-tissue balance.

CT or X-ray based pre-operative planning
Real-time intra-operative adjustment for soft-tissue balance
Consistent implant alignment across complex deformities
Used for total and partial knee replacement, and total hip replacement

Conventional Joint Replacement

Time-tested, still the right choice for many patients

Conventional surgery relies on manual instrumentation and surgeon experience rather than a robotic arm. For straightforward joint anatomy, outcomes between conventional and robotic-assisted surgery are comparable — the decision is about anatomy and complexity, not about which technique is "better."

Well-established technique with decades of long-term outcome data
Shorter operating time in straightforward cases
No additional imaging required before surgery
Often the more cost-effective option where anatomy is uncomplicated

Making The Choice

How Dr. Singh decides which approach to recommend

Imaging Review

Your X-rays or CT scans are reviewed to assess deformity, bone quality and joint alignment.

Complexity Assessment

Straightforward anatomy often does equally well with conventional technique; complex deformity benefits more from robotic precision.

Patient Discussion

Cost, recovery goals and activity level are factored in before a final recommendation is made together with you.